One of the best teaching tools the Stanton Church of Christ had going for it in its old Non-Member Classes was the infamous Suitcase of Books. Eventually the inconvenience of passing it around to the next Non-Member Class Teacher, or perhaps the hypocrisy of it, led to its demise. Nevertheless, The Suitcase of Books played a convincing role in many conversions to the sect, because it truly was a unique and effective visual illustration of the confusion caused by the doctrines and traditions of fallible men.
I’m not positive the Suitcase of Books has been retired completely, actually. If it hasn’t, it most definitely has lost some of its rhetorical power, because alas, the point made by the Teachers using the Suitcase has come back to point the finger at them.
So what was the Suitcase of Books, and how was it used?
Prior to each Non-Member Class (traditionally on Thursday evenings), a big suitcase would be passed to the next teacher of the class. When I was growing up in Stanton, California, there were several who took turns teaching the class, and each passed the suitcase on to the next Teacher.
At the beginning of the class, the suitcase was always sitting, either on the table, or next to the Teacher’s chair. At some point during the class, the Teacher would start talking about all the religions out there that have arisen due to men’s fallible and changing doctrines. As each sect was brought up, the Teacher would display a book by the founder of that sect.
You had Charles Taze Russell’s Watchtower writings, which led to the eventual founding of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. You had the teachings of Joseph Smith, and the subsequent formation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. You had Ellen G. White’s teachings, which led to the Seventh Day Adventists, and Mary Baker Eddie’s teachings, which led to Church of Christ, Scientists.
The list went on and on, and the rhetorical impact grew, as the pile on the desk (usually a T.V. tray) grew larger and larger. Then, the illustration would culminate with the idea that we don’t really need all these teachings of men. We just need the Bible alone, and all these religions may change and update their teachings, but the Truth never changes. Therefore, any church which changed its teachings could not possibly be teaching only the Truth. The Bible, it was concluded, was sufficient for learning all of what Jesus taught. We didn’t need the Bible plus some other book or audio of the teachings of fallible men and women.
So why has the Suitcase of Books perhaps fallen out of use? Maybe it’s because now, a large amount of the teachings of the Stanton churches cannot be found in the Bible at all, and in fact, can only be defended based on the “doctrines and commandments of men;” mere opinions, usually couched as “judgments” of the church, and often formed based on the church’s founding documents or a long tradition of May Meetings. To add to the weight of hypocrisy, while other religions were excoriated for “changing” and updating their doctrines from time to time, Stanton gets a free pass to do this each May (or March, as the case may be).
The hypocrisy of waging rhetorical battle against the writings and teachings of men in other sects, while passing around their own writings and teachings of men as the basis for church doctrine, was not un-anticipated at the time, either. I clearly remember the objections of members at a discussion in the home of my best friend’s mom, over sending church funds to help publish Merie Weiss’s book Put Up Thy Sword, while the church regularly taught that it didn’t need men’s books plus the Bible–it just needed the Bible alone.
But the objection, as far as my young memory serves me, was overruled, and the church did support the publishing of Merie’s book. While the hypocrisy in that case was blatant, the more subtle hypocrisy was (and is) that the church continues to publish and distribute the lessons of its current crop of Teachers in the church with 21st Century vigor. Distribution of these teachings of men is accomplished with CDs, carefully organized Dropbox accounts, iPods, and MP3 players. The buzz following each meeting always builds around this person or that person’s talk at the most recent meeting.
Am I saying it’s wrong to publish sermons? Of course not. If we truly believe what we are saying, we should want our words published, albeit publicly, not secretly to protect them from criticism. But when the teachings of men become so devoid of any valid Biblical basis so no one can point to book, chapter and verse for any of the church’s controversial teachings, rules or judgments, isn’t it clear that the real lesson of the Suitcase of Books has been lost?
The Suitcase of Books showed that followers of Jesus only need the Bible to learn about his life, example, and teachings. Perhaps this is a good time for “members” to re-learn that once-foundational “non-member” lesson.
My first non member class I remember was being told God doesn't Love you in exclamation point. I had discovered the Bible and the word of God for the first time in my life that year. And I my heart had fallen in love with the scriptures. I was even aware the ten commandant s were in the Bible. So when I heard god doesn't Love you n I needed to be baptism. I had no second thought to obey my God n it broke my heart that all these month s God didn't hear my prayers. My life change… Read more »
They actually came right out and taught that God doesn't love non-members? Am I understanding you right, Anon 10:23?
I was around in the early 80's for a few years and have listened to countless tapes of Merie and still do. I have never heard such a thing. Only that God doesn't hear the prayers of sinner like the scriptures state.
@Lynn, the Scriptures don't really teach that God doesn't hear the prayers of a sinner. That is pulled out of context from the comments of the man healed by Jesus. The Pharisees were accusing Jesus of being a sinner, and he was defending him by saying "we know that God doesn't hear the prayers of a sinner." There is no suggestion that his statement was factually true. We are all sinners save by grace, plus we have a clear example of a non-Christian, Cornelius, whose prayers were heard. This man was simply stating his belief as taught by the sect… Read more »
Isaiah 59:1, 2 Behold, the Lord's hand is not shortened, that it cannot save; neither his ear heavy, that it cannot hear: But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.
When we become Christians we are no longer sinners in the way that God categorizes them.
Cornelius was an exception.
1 Peter 3:12 For the eyes of the Lord are over the righteous, and his ears are open unto their prayers: but the face of the Lord is against them that do evil.
@Lynn, You are making an assertion that Cornelius was an exception to a rule that God doesn't hear the prayers of the unbaptized. I'm saying there is no such rule.
Of course he doesn't "hear," meaning "regard," the prayers of those who are in open rebellion against him. But he certainly hears and regards the prayers of those who are seeking his face, whether baptized or not.
I agree, Kevin.
Kevin I have hand written notes from my first non member class quoting the teacher. God doesn't love you n citing numerous scpritures the reason why. I do believe he was referring to how the world teaches god loves. I will find the notes. The day after I was baptize I went back to my Friday night bible at a worldly church n experienced grief fear n shame for being baptized. Is this normal?
Ann 10
@Anon11:51 that's awful that anyone would teach that God doesn't love. What a miserable existence we are doomed to have, and what an awful God to create us if that's the case. I'd love to see your notes. Can you scan them or transcribe them? I'm fascinated to know how they would ever justify that doctrine.
Hey Lynn! I just wanted to point out to you that in Isaiah 59, God is actually speaking to his own saved and chosen people! He wasn't speaking to the Gentiles, but to the Jews. I find that very interesting! To think that God had stopped listening to his own people because of their sin. It also made me realize I could no longer use that scripture in the non-members class! When my teacher asked me why I had stopped using it, I told her. She told me I was wrong, that God was speaking to non-members! I reminded her… Read more »
I find one of the most humorous out-of-context verses to be the one in Isaiah referenced in Merie's "Church Lesson" to "prove" that the name of the church is "Church of Christ." If you read down the chapter, the actual name is Hephzibah. 🙂
Hello Debby, I agree with what you said.
Interesting concerning if Merie used the treasury to fund her writings of her book or did members just give her money. If the treasury was the source I wonder if she exhausted all other options first? Also with John 9:31 which is almost always misquoted as prayer is not mentioned in the verse.
We talk to God through prayer.
I have heard it shared that as one may be driving they simply talk to God.
Funny, I never heard the most wicked religious book of hate and filth ever mentioned in a Stanton Bible class. It’s the Talmud, the book the evil Pharisees were following. This is why Christ rightfully rebuked them so severely. It legalizes murder, lying, stealing, cheating, child molestation, transgenderism, and homosexuality. None of us hear about this book in our schools and media because Talmudic Jews run the schools and media. That’s why no American, no matter what religion, ought to have a television, watch movies, read the newspaper, or listen to the radio. All are controlled by the insidious parasite… Read more »
Another wonderful book written by a man frequently demonized in church is “The Jews and their Lies” by Martin Luther.
It’s on my website, 12/26/23.
He told the truth behind the greatest threat to the Christian church for the past 2,000 years.